Cameras may fund traffic safety in Lake Forest Park despite $3 million deficit
Monday, October 14, 2024
A driver speeds toward the automated traffic safety cameras on 178th street where there are no sidewalks - photo by Oliver Moffat |
By Oliver Moffatt
LFP expects a $3 million deficit for the 2025-2026 biennium but millions from traffic cameras could pay for sidewalks and traffic safety.
In his budget for the 2025-2026 biennium, Mayor Tom French said Lake Forest Park will have a $1.5 million deficit each year over the next two years. But revenue from traffic cameras could build sidewalks across the city. City staff said the deficit was “largely due to the state’s 1% cap on property taxes and 3% inflation on average.” Compared to neighboring cities, Lake Forest Park has lower property taxes and collects less revenue from real estate construction.
Lake Forest Park’s budget deficit predates recent high inflation rates: the 2019-2020 budget had a deficit of $877,000, then a deficit of $1.25 million in the 2021-2022 biennial budget, and a $1.9 million deficit in the 2023-2024 budget. But now with rising expenses for police compensation, public defenders, jail services, and 911 dispatch the city expects a $3 million deficit for the 2025-2026 budget.
Lake Forest Park voters have repeatedly rejected past city property tax increases by wide margins. A levy to pay for parks and sidewalks on the 2021 ballot was rejected by over 65% of Lake Forest Park voters and a 2010 property tax levy was rejected by 77.97%. Although a fire levy lift in August this year was approved by 67.38% of Lake Forest Park voters preventing what Fire Chief Cowan called a “critical” budget imbalance.
Lake Forest Park expects to collect $7,161,227 in property taxes over the next two years. In 2024, Lake Forest Park collected about $0.80 for every $1000 of a home’s assessed value (AV). The median-priced-home in Lake Forest Park was assessed at $790,000 which means a median-priced-homeowner paid roughly $635.39 in property taxes to the city. In contrast, a median-priced-homeowner in Shoreline paid a little over $1200 and Kenmore charged a little over $821 in 2024.
At the Thursday October 10 meeting the Lake Forest Park city council discussed hiring an outside consultant to help the city prepare a possible levy lid lift to put on the ballot next year. In a job post for the external consultant, the city said it is facing a “structural financial deficit” and was considering placing a levy on the 2025 ballot.
The city collects less revenue from real estate taxes and construction fees compared to neighboring cities and Lake Forest Park’s draft comprehensive plan says its strict zoning laws are a barrier to affordable housing development. Lake Forest Park expects only $650,000 from Real Estate Excise Taxes (REET) during the next biennium while Kenmore expects $3.5 million from REET over the next two years and Shoreline collected $3.49 million in REET over the last two years despite a cooling real estate market.
Shoreline last month reported stronger than planned revenues driven in part from taxes and fees from multifamily housing construction near the new light rail stations. Kenmore has $10.4 million in its general fund reserves (well above the $3.3 million required) which staff attributed in part to taxes and fees received from real estate developments such as the new condominiums downtown.
A graph from the Lake Forest Park budget shows Public Safety is the city’s largest single expenditure at 33% of the budget |
Public Safety is Lake Forest Park’s largest spending category at 33% of the 2025-2026 budget (costing $15,257,380). Most of that will go to the Lake Forest Park police department. Police salaries have increased by 13.6%, 911 dispatch services have increased by 41.5%, and the city is expecting to pay more than twice as much to jail its prisoners. Municipal court costs are up 7.5% and the city will pay 13.6% more for its public defenders. Those costs could increase even more if the Washington Supreme Court approves a proposal from the Washington State Bar Association to reduce public defender caseloads to address a “crisis of attrition”.
The city expects to collect $12 million in traffic safety camera fines over the next biennium thanks to a new state law that allowed the city to increase fines and leave the cameras on all-day throughout the year after designating 178th near Brookside elementary a “school walk zone.” The old red-light cameras along Bothell Way and the speed cameras near Lake Forest Park elementary will bring $4,381,800 and the city expects its “New Traffic Safety Fund” to earn $8,040,000 from the cameras on 178th near Brookside elementary.
Traffic camera operating costs have increased from $765,000 last biennium to $2,326,440 in part because the city will hire an additional police officer, a support officer, and two court clerks to keep up with the work of processing tickets. In August, Municipal Court Judge Jennifer Grant cautioned the city about the workload caused by more than 23,000 traffic camera tickets last year. “Each and every one of those tickets does amount to a significant amount of work,” said Judge Grant.
The city is keeping revenue from the old cameras and the new cameras separate because the new state law requires the city to now spend funds on traffic safety improvements after paying operating costs (the city was previously allowed to deposit the revenue into the general fund). The budget does not specify which traffic safety projects would be funded with the millions expected each year. The levy for parks and sidewalks that voters rejected in 2021 would have collected about $2 million annually to pay for a network of sidewalks across the city - especially near schools.
So maybe pedestrians in Lake Forest Park will get sidewalks after all.
11 comments:
GREAT article. I live in Lake Forest Park and cannot understand why we can't get any of these tax increases passed. Nobody *likes* more taxes but it's one of the ways we pay for the things the City needs.
I thought that was a no racing zone. (At least that’s what the signs said) Now it’s all of a sudden a walk zone? I guess whatever they need to do to justify the tickets. I wouldn’t have a problem with the speed cameras if they would just be honest about them. Call them what they are and don’t try to tell us it’s about public safety. Why not just call this an “additional revenue to make up a budget deficit” zone.
This Mayor and Council have run the city into the ground. How many unnecessary initiatives has the City taken on over the past few years? Overly burdensome tree ordinance w/ on-staff arborist; fighting Sound Transit's bus lanes; Climate Action work (a town of 12k people will make zero difference on global warming, but it makes people feel good); acquisition of two new park properties which the City doesn't have the money to maintain (not to mention the money spent on design for one).
And, if the cameras are about safety, shouldn't revenue for those continue to decline because they change behaviors? People start driving more safe? Instead, they are a cash cow.
You want to save money? Stop the special initiatives. Stop with the NIMBY fights over bus lanes. Get rid of the part-time Mayor and go with a Council-Manager system. Stop acquiring properties you can't afford. Change the lousy zoning for Town Center so you actually see some improvement there. Get back to basics before asking me for more money.
Thank you posting this article. It is very informative. I'm sure I'm missing key points or items, but some of my takeaways.
Running a city can’t be an easy task, let alone managing the budget. It’s not easy. Easy things would have been done already to address the shortfalls.
If I’m managing a budget I’m going to be looking at the larger percentage items. For Lake Forest Park, 33% is the police department’s budget (labeled as Public Safety in the pie chart). I don’t know how that percentage compares to other comparable sized cities in the area. LFP is a little unique in that the school district is combined with Shoreline so the percentages likely aren’t 1:1 with cities that fund a school district. The Shoreline school district budget is a whole other can of worms. I would not be giving raises of 13.6% to this function. I’m not pro or anti-police; just basic budgeting. There are likely issues attracting officers which lead to the need to increase pay. Do we know how much of the $381,125 per year compensation per police dept employee (slide 9 of the police dept presentation link under the pie chart) is insurance? I’m assuming their insurance is much higher than an average individual due to the line of work, but wow. $380k/yr seems like a lot.
I have lived in the city for five years. In that time my property tax has increased 60% (a combination of increased assessed value and increased tax rate). According to the King County Parcel Viewer, Mayor French’s property tax has increased 41% in those five years. For the city government to complain about the 1% lid is misleading marketing. As a potential solution the city may hire a consultant to figure out how to get a measure on the ballot to raise taxes? High fives all around! (/sarcasm detector explodes).
As with a lot of government, the only answer seems to be more revenue (tax). Reducing expenditures is seemingly never considered. It's exhausting to have a good job and go to work every day, but get poorer and poorer every year by just existing. I will be voting no if a levy lid measure is on the ballot next year.
This article doesn't indicate how much sales tax funds are being generated. Keep in mind that the city gets sales tax from both brick and mortar businesses and delivered purchases from Amazon and others.
It's not perfect, but using traffic cameras to fund traffic safety improvements is a pretty reasonable strategy. The irresponsible drivers who choose to endanger others are the ones that get to pay for the safety improvements.
👍💯👍
I know Bothell Way traffic is absolute hell. But they should stop pushing back on Sound Transit bus lanes and upzone land around it. Can't survive in an area like this without more intensive development.
We always knew that traffic cameras were about revenue, not safety. This just cements it.
Recently, Shoreline City Council got awfully defensive about the allegation that their pilot program on traffic cameras was largely about revenue generation. The officials doth protest too much.
I'm a proponent of traffic cameras and got caught by the one in the school 20mph zone on 178th - bad on me - paid the $136 fine and reminded myself to not go "25ish" in a "20". 2nd ticket in >30 years - both in LFP!!
These traffic cams are supposed to increase safety! BS! They are sold as profit generators! If they worked they would not be a planned income source. Wake up DFs!
Post a Comment