Letter to the Editor: Civic and Aquatic Center versus Parks – Really?
Sunday, June 9, 2019
To the Editor:
Please check out the numbers below. They are taken from the May 20th City Council packet with the single exception of more current housing numbers.
Shoreline
Please check out the numbers below. They are taken from the May 20th City Council packet with the single exception of more current housing numbers.
- The Civic and Aquatics Center will add $16 per month to the taxes of the median home.
- The recommended and significantly reduced park improvements would add $4 per month.
- Putting both on the ballot will allow us, to choose one or both. 28% of respondents have already indicated they prefer both. (I’m one of them.)
- Aren't the survey’s results too close for the City Council to deny taxpayers a choice? I believe taxpayers have the right to choose.
- City Council is seriously considering withholding the vote the option to improve parks until who knows when.
- If you don't like Council denying your right to choose, then please tell them.
Shoreline
2 comments:
Agree
I agree with Boni. Also I was shocked that the Parks were hardly acknowledged as important by the majority of the Council. Parks are especially important and more so than a new swimming facility, which quite frankly in my opinion, should be a county supported investment to spread out the costs. My property taxes are increasing far more than $16.00/month and in addition there are the increases by the county assessor. For more on the value of green spaces, our parks, go to a recent article by 'Outside Magazine.' One can google "The Nature Cure: Inside the health Revolution that could change your life."
Post a Comment