Gretchen Atkinson and Ginny Scantlebury are running for a full six-year term on the Ronald Wastewater District Board in the Nov. 5 general election.
The two finished ahead of incumbent Arthur Wadekamper in the Aug. 6 primary election.
The position is one of two Ronald Wastewater Board positions on the November ballot. The other is for one of the new positions created in 2012.
Here are statements on campaign issues from the two candidates for the full term:
Gretchen Atkinson
Last year, I was appalled at numerous Ronald decisions, which were costly to ratepayers. The current board majority is working in a vacuum, leading the organization down the wrong path.
Campaign Issues:
• Increasing their board to five commissioners, after decades at three. Furthermore, appointing the individual just voted out.
• As a commissioner, I will advocate for prudent spending of our limited revenues. Additional costs for five commissioners, $80,000 feasibility study for a Super Utility District, and hiking the Public Relations budget to $100,000 is reckless spending.
• As a candidate, my Public Documents Requests have been plagued by “run-around.” The organization has operated for decades without public scrutiny. I will require Transparency.
• State Law protects the $6 million Reserve Funds exclusively for wastewater investments.
Finally, I believe the 2002 Interlocal Agreement, authored and signed by the City and Ronald is an enforceable, binding contract. Instead, Ronald is spending your money suing the City. The City is required to defend itself in court; so now, all of us are paying for an unnecessary lawsuit. Finally, if it is the people’s will to take the assumption to a vote, I will support that.
I believe that the two most important issues pertaining to Ronald Wastewater District are:
• To determine whether the ratepayers have the right to vote on whether they want Shoreline or Ronald Wastewater District to run the sewer system.
• To determine whether the District can inform the Ronald ratepayers and engage the public about their choices in utility management. The City is using the Interlocal Agreement, signed in 2002, to try to silence the District.
It is important that the Shoreline ratepayers understand that the District has been doing a great job taking care of our sewer needs since 1951. The District is low cost (some of the lowest rates in the state); they have relatively low debt (approximately $2 million) and the District has over $6 million in cash reserves available for future maintenance and improvements.
I believe that Ronald Wastewater is not broken; therefore, there’s no need to fix it. The system we have should continue until the Shoreline ratepayers are given full disclosure by the City of all the potential costs (including diversion of the current and future District’s reserves, potential increased taxes and higher rates) and a discussion of potential benefits.