By Evan Smith
We recently reported that a State Senate Committee has approved a resolution that would make the requirement of a two-thirds vote of the legislature part of the State constitution.
It’s a reaction to last week’s State Supreme Court decision that ruled that a voter-approved two-thirds requirement is unconstitutional.
It’s a futile effort.
For a Senate joint resolution (or House joint resolution) to amend the State constitution it needs a two-thirds vote of both houses of the legislature and a majority vote in a statewide election.
That means 33 votes in the 49-member Senate and 66 votes in the 98-member House of Representatives to send it to the November ballot,
The resolution passed the Republican-controled Ways and Means Committee by a 13-10 vote. It may get a majority in the Senate, which is controled by a coalition of 23 Republicans and two conservative Democrats, but, even if one or two other conservative “road kill” Democrats join them, minority liberal Democrats have enough votes to prevent a two-thirds majority, and House majority liberal Democrats will either vote it down overwhelmingly or not let it come to a vote. So, there are no chances of its appearing as a proposed constitutional amendment on the November ballot.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We encourage the thoughtful sharing of information and ideas. We expect comments to be civil and respectful, with no personal attacks or offensive language. We reserve the right to delete any comment.